7 Ethics Terms You Must Know for an MMI
Multiple Mini Interview (MMI)
Biomedical ethics stations do not have to be scary if you know some basic ethics concepts. Understanding the following 5 principles and 2 models will help you to succeed in your medical school interviews and to make ethical decisions as a doctor.
“Everyone has a duty to advance the good of others if it is possible to do so without undue risk to oneself.”1 This is what doctors aim to do – provide beneficial treatment to help each individual. It is important to note what counts as “advancing the good of an individual” is always relative to that individual’s values, not the treating physician’s.
Following beneficence, the principle of non-maleficence states everyone has a duty to prevent harm to others. Often this is abbreviated to: Do no harm. Again, what counts as harm is subjective and relative to the values of the recipient, not those of the health care professionals.
Justice and Equality
These ethical principles state persons who have similar circumstances and conditions should be treated alike. Equality may not necessarily mean two people should be treated exactly the same – it means people should be treated equitably, taking into account ethically relevant differences. In healthcare, these concepts are often applied to scarce resource distribution.
“All persons are autonomous beings worthy of respect, and as such have a fundamental right to self-determination that is limited only by unjust infringement on the rights of others.”1
In a healthcare sense, autonomy means all competent patients are self-determining decision-makers. Accordingly, they have the right to accept or decline any health care intervention. This concept is absent in paternalistic health care models, which will be discussed next.
In a paternalistic health care system, expertise confers authority, meaning doctors have ultimate power to make all treatment decisions for patients. While these decisions are made in the best interest of the patient, this model violates autonomy and ignores the requirement for informed consent. The paternalistic model was prevalent historically and is still used in some countries; It is not how modern medicine is practiced in North America.
Fiduciary is Latin for trust. In the fiduciary model, the physician and patient trust each other and the autonomy of patients is balanced against the expertise of physicians.1 What this means is this model respects the physician-patient power differential yet allows the patient’s values to direct any health care intervention. This model is the contemporary standard for ethical health care.
Once you have an understanding of these principles, it is essential to practice applying them to practice scenarios. Note I purposefully directed you to understand these 7 terms instead of just know them. It is less important to use these actual terms in your answers than to properly apply their concepts to the station’s prompt.
At MedApplications, our expert MMI coaches are doctors who face real-life ethical decisions daily. They are the ultimate resource in preparing you for the toughest MMI scenarios. Check out our packages that include full length mock MMIs and comprehensive feedback here.
1Kluge, Eike-Henner W. 2013. Ethics in Health Care: A Canadian Focus. Ed. 1. Pearson, Toronto.
START YOUR APPLICATION TODAY!
Our Application Consultants
Our Consultants specialize in your medical school application.
We work with you every step of the way as your personal medical coach. With first-hand experience as practicing medical doctors we know what it takes to achieve success in the medical school admissions process. During application crunch time, we work round the clock to ensure your application is completed to the highest of competitive standards. Find Out More About MedApplications
Our Medical Coaches pride ourselves on offering a premium service by leading physicians in medical school preparation. However, if you do not find your consultation useful, or feel that the consultant is not a great fit, you must let your consultant know at the conclusion of your first consultation or review, prior to finishing and we will contact you to arrange another complimentary session or review with a new consultant. See Terms and Conditions
Get On The Inside Track
Alyssa (May 2016)
Accepted to McMaster University & University of Ottawa Medicine
“My experience with MedApplications was fantastic! The interview seminar and manual were very instructive regarding specific topics to focus on for the interview and approaches to answering different question types…
David (May 2016)
Accepted to Western University Schulich School of Medicine
“I enrolled in a MedApplications Interview seminar one month prior to my first medical school interview opportunity. Before participating in the course, I had very little specific knowledge regarding interview format, question types, emphasis and expectations of the interviewers…
Vanessa (June 2016)
“I was accepted at Ottawa which was my ideal school and my only interview. Josh was absolutely wonderful and definitely part of my success! He was very helpful throughout the entire process :)”
Ian (May 2015)
McMaster University of Medicine
“I used the MedApplications seminar and mock interview services before I had my interviews at Queen’s and McMaster medical schools, and I couldn’t be happier with my decision…
Queen’s University Medicine
“My experience with medapplications.com was great. What I liked most about my consultant is that he always responded in time about any concerns that I had…
Liana (May 2016)
University of Western Shulich School of Medicine
“Before working with medapplications, I had a fear of interviews. I’ve had practices with friends and other students, but for some reason I wasn’t able to gain the confidence needed….
Marlene (August 2016)
University of London St. George’s College
“Hi MedApplications, just to let you know that Isabelle got an offer from University of London St. George’s College. The competition this year was quite challenging…